The Proposed Pool

This forum is shown on the index page along with all topics.
Santila23
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:56 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Santila23 » Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:38 pm

Please sign your name and we will not delete your post.

Santila23
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:56 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Santila23 » Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:20 pm

Sandor Feher
U.S.Land Surveyor (ret.)
Last edited by Santila23 on Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

moose
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:18 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by moose » Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:32 pm

Relieved to see that I am not the only one concerned about prop 1
Glad to know most folks are aware of the dangerous burden this prop would enact
Glad to know most folks, including me, support a local pool project
Without question there are reasonable ways to accomplish this goal
No to prop 1
Joe Frey

Reapward
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:40 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Reapward » Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:37 pm

FYI. The hospital levy and the Metropolitan Park District levy are both Prop. 1.
The auditor knows this and says it is not unusual. But folks should be aware when they get their ballots to know which one they are voting for or against.
Pearl Cherrington

Santila23
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:56 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Santila23 » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:47 pm

As I stated earlier, their is money to build the pool but we would vote on to OPERATING cost of the pool that is under the special taxing district that eventuality would be the White Elephant. Administration cost will not decline but increase and want more and more.
Just come on to your common sense, ask question and most important VOTE!VOTE! and vote NO!NO! including the $72M Bond issue for theThree Rivers hospital.
Sandor Feher
U.S. Land Surveyor (ret.)

Reapward
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:40 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Reapward » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:55 pm

There is money to build the pool? I sure didn't think that. They need money to design the pool, purchase the land, then build it. Then money to maintain it, heat it, etc.
The Proposition is for a Metropolitan Park District, which has an appointed Board, not elected. Search Metropolitan Park District and you will see what an MPD entails.
It is a forever tax.
Vote no.
Pearl Cherrington

karlukkid
Posts: 947
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:23 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by karlukkid » Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:22 pm

Signs will be available this Friday. Bruce Herron Wolf Creek
Bruce Herron Wolf Creek

Peter Larsen
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:47 pm

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Peter Larsen » Mon Sep 18, 2023 5:45 pm

I’ve had multiple posts removed from this thread without any explanation even though my legal name appears on top and is registered with the administrator! Please reinstall my deleted posts as this reflects poorly on the administration of this website and lends itself to the conclusion that this is a biased site . Mr. Peter Larsen . With “Compassionate Citizens for Responsible Civic Behavior in favor of a sensibly funded Pool . Peter Larsen . I’m unable to get the signature feature to function ?
Last edited by Peter Larsen on Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Peter Larsen
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:47 pm

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Peter Larsen » Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:48 am

Those who have had there posts deleted , please repost with your name at the bottom. Whether you’re for or against this Metropolitan tax district ,your input is valuable. I invite anyone who endorses this prop to step forward here to comment and … don’t forget to add your name . Peter Larsen,

Former Winthrop Parks committee member , Founder Winthrop Rink and Winthrop Amateur Hockey Association.

Reapward
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:40 am

Re: The Proposed Pool

Post by Reapward » Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:55 am

Your posts have been saved in another place, btw. :)
Pearl Cherrington

Post Reply

Return to “Main Forum”     Back